You want to make your dog “happy,” right?
Of course you do. Maybe you buy my argument that, due to the emotional bonds that you’ve developed to your dog, it’s in your self-interest to do so. Or maybe you’ve got another justification.
And maybe you agree with me that most humans know precious little about how their dogs perceive and experience the world (i.e., whether their dogs are happy). Or maybe you don’t.
But if you live with a dog — if you feed him, give him shelter, take him for walks, buy him toys, finance his expensive medical procedures, scratch his belly, and let him sleep in your bed — you’d have a hard time making the case that you simply don’t care about “making him happy.”
So here’s the $64,000 Question: What does that mean?
If you’ve spent any time meditating on this question then you already know how slippery potential answers can be.
As this mind-blowing presentation shows, human beings (even some really smart ones) have a very hard time talking and thinking about their own happiness. Thinking about what it means for a dog to be happy is exponentially more difficult because of (a) the fundamental differences in how dogs perceive, experience, and think about the world and (b) dogs’ inability to communicate their internal experiential states using verbal terms.
That being said, here’s why devoting attentive thought to this question is a worthwhile activity: Thinking about this topic will help you battle your innate tendency to assume that your worldview is fundamentally correct. We all have a tendency to assume that we’re right. We fight this tendency off in some instances but let it captain the ship for most of our lives. Curiously, for many of us, the tendency is most pronounced when it comes to big questions that don’t lend themselves well to easy, verifiable answers (such as the one which is the subject of this essay).
While this tendency makes things comfortable for our fragile egos it also has the profound tendency to lead us astray of our goals. (To see this amazing phenomenon in action just stop by your local health club and watch the hordes of body image-obsessed patrons logging long, torturous workouts on machines that won’t do much to improve their bodies.)
So if maximizing the well-being of your pet is something you care about (and I know because your are reading this blog that it is), you should be willing to push back against your assumptions about a hard topic like happiness. You should be open to changing your perspective in the service of your worthy goal.
Let me dash your budding expectations right now and tell you that I don’t have a definitive “correct” answer to the question and neither does anyone else. That being said, in two weeks (on Thursday, March 1 — mark your calendars!) I’ll post a follow-up essay that summarizes the perspectives of several popular culture “dog experts,” numerous scientists, practitioners, and other leading thinkers, as well as my own personal thoughts on the issue.
In the meantime, my goals with this preliminary post are two-fold: (1) I want to get you thinking on your own about this interesting topic and (2) I want to encourage you to share your pre-existing perspectives in the “comments” section of this post.
Sharing your thoughts now — before you are exposed to influential thoughts from others — is crucial. It will help you to crystalize into an articulable form your vague ideas of what “happiness” means for dogs. It will also maximize the usefulness of this project by ensuring that everyone who reads this post is exposed to a rich variety of perspectives on the issue. If you just wait around for the big guns to weigh in, you’re likely to defer to them and just avoid voicing your opinion altogether.
You’re smart! You’re interesting! Your thoughts are valuable! Now, let’s hear them!
Sound good? Great. I look forward to reading your comments and to discussing this interesting issue with you.
Have a great Thursday,
– Coach Dan